Psychological Fragility Among a Sample of Journalists and Photographers While Covering Hot Events (Mixed Methods)

Abstract

Background & Statement of the problem: The presence of journalists and photographers in conflict zones exposes them to psychological vulnerabilities, which may lead to the development of psychological disorders over time.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the level of psychological fragility among a sample of journalists and photographers during their coverage of events in conflict zones in Palestine.

Methods: To achieve the study objectives, a mixed-methods approach was employed. The Obaidat Psychological Fragility Scale (2021) was administered to a sample of 141 participants selected using purposive sampling method.

Results: The findings revealed an average level of psychological fragility, with a mean score of 2.76, representing 54% of the maximum score. Additionally, the results indicated no statistically significant differences in the mean scores of psychological fragility based on the type of work variable. However, statistically significant differences were observed in the mean scores based on years of experience. Qualitative analysis identified several factors contributing to psychological fragility, including extended work hours without breaks, exposure to distressing live scenes, lack of protection from potential harm and attacks, and insufficient psychological support.

Conclusions (Recommendations and contributions): The study recommends the importance of developing comprehensive and effective counseling programs to reduce psychological vulnerability and improve levels of psychological resilience among journalists and photographers specializing in covering hot events.