Mental Health Risks in Medical Students: A Cognitive–Behavioral Model of Distress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35875/3b3b5v65Keywords:
Mental Health, Risk Factors, Medical Students, Cognitive–Behavioral Model, Psychological DistressAbstract
Objective: This study examines mental health risks among medical students through a cognitive–behavioral lens, focusing on the interplay between anxiety, depression, perfectionism (normal and neurotic), and occupational stress coping strategies. Given the demanding nature of medical education and the dual function of perfectionism—adaptive versus maladaptive—the research explores how these psychological constructs contribute to emotional distress.
Methodology: A descriptive, correlational design was adopted. The primary sample included 300 medical students from multiple Jordanian universities, preceded by a pilot sample of 123 participants to validate the psychometric properties of the instruments. Tools used included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS), and a researcher-developed Occupational Stress Coping Strategies Scale. All instruments demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > .90).
Findings: Significant positive correlations were observed between neurotic perfectionism, anxiety, depression, and negative coping strategies. In contrast, normal perfectionism was positively associated with positive coping strategies and negatively correlated with psychological distress. Female students reported significantly higher anxiety levels than males. Regression analyses indicated that both anxiety and depression significantly predicted neurotic perfectionism and maladaptive coping strategies, with depression emerging as the stronger predictor across genders.
Implications: These findings highlight the importance of addressing maladaptive perfectionism and ineffective coping strategies in interventions targeting medical students’ mental health. The results offer actionable insights for designing cognitive–behavioral programs that foster adaptive self-appraisal and stress resilience. The study also introduces a culturally validated coping strategies scale suitable for use in Arab medical education contexts.
Conclusion: Neurotic perfectionism and negative coping strategies substantially increase vulnerability to anxiety and depression in medical students. Addressing these cognitive-emotional patterns through structured interventions could enhance students’ psychological flexibility and resilience throughout their medical training.





